[unable to retrieve full-text content]Ο μέσος Αμερικανός περνάει περίπου 38 ώρες ετησίως κολλημένος στην κίνηση.
[unable to retrieve full-text content]Ένταση επικράτησε χθες στο Survivor με τις νέες ομάδες. Η συγκίνηση της Ασημίνας Ιγγλέζου για τη μαχητικότητα της κόκκινης ομάδας προκάλεσε τα ειρωνικά χειροκροτήματα των πρώην συμπαικτών της στην μπλε ομάδα. Ο Τριαντάφυλλος θύμωσε και την είπε στην Μαριπόζα για την συμπεριφορά της. «Μαριπόζα, είσαι ένα φρέσκο κορίτσι, όμορφο, με πολλούς followers στο Instagram. Είσαι […]
Safety Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implementing A Digital JHA Tool The Job Hazard Analysis process focuses on job tasks to identify hazards before they occur. By Chris MillerJan 20, 2021 The COVID-19 pandemic reinforced the need for streamlined, accessible safety analysis tools across the construction industry. This especially includes safety risk management tools that site supervisors and line employees can easily and consistently use to ensure tasks are conducted according to approved procedures and plans. Too often, conditions on site can result in silos between functions, team members and even systems and components. Sadly, COVID-19 has once again demonstrated the need for a holistic, integrated approach to consistently maintaining safe site conditions for everyone involved in construction, as well as those impacted beyond the work site in the case of the virus. William Mueller, an HSE manager at a PM/CM/PgM firm, described the firm’s success in developing and implementing a tool to consistently support site safety even under pandemic conditions. Mueller says that the key to the company’s detection and prevention efforts was the development of a user-friendly digital Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) process. The JHA focuses on job tasks to identify hazards before they occur, stressing the relationship between the worker, the task, the tools and the work environment. After identifying uncontrolled hazards with a JHA, the team then takes steps to eliminate or reduce hazards to an acceptable risk level. A Team Effort Mueller notes that creating the digital JHA process required close collaboration with the company’s IT Department. In an industry sometimes slow to adapt to new technologies, Mueller notes that working with IT was critical to developing a seamless and easy-to-implement JHA process and creating a central repository for JHA data available across the company for future reference. “This was a truly collaborative effort between the safety department and our IT experts,” says Mueller. “It definitely was not a top-down process where our construction professionals simply laid out some requirements and expected IT to deliver. IT’s contributions, beyond designing and building the inputs, outputs and structures needed for the process, included help on achieving a user experience that field employees could embrace with a minimal learning curve. A tool no one uses is not a useful tool, no matter how well intentioned or designed.” Let's block ads! (Why?)
[unable to retrieve full-text content]Κάθε δευτερόλεπτο, ο Ήλιος...
[unable to retrieve full-text content]European Commission Speech Brussels, 19 Jan 2021 Today we stand before you with a message of unity, solidarity and coordination. This pandemic has tested our resilience as a Union like nothing before.
[unable to retrieve full-text content]European Commission Speech Brussels, 19 Jan 2021 At the start of this new year, we have good reasons to be cautiously optimistic. With the first vaccinations now well under way, the end of the pandemic could be in sight, though not yet in reach.
2021 Freight and Shipping Employee Safety Trends 2020 highlighted how much health and safety oversight there was in the industry, emphasizing the need for better insights. By Devin PartidaJan 19, 2021 Every industry has encountered hardships amid the pandemic, but freight and shipping has faced more than most. As the novel coronavirus continues to spread in 2021, most shippers have recuperated to some degree, but challenges remain. The sector has found it needs to adjust its approach to many areas, including employee safety. In 2021, the freight and shipping sector faces many of the same health hazards it did in 2020. However, it is now coming at these hazards with experience, leading to new trends in employee safety. Wearable Proximity Sensors Social distancing in a warehouse isn’t always easy, but some have found a way to enable it. Companies like Amazon implemented wearable proximity sensors that alert workers when they get close to one another. As the pandemic’s spread persists this year, this trend will likely continue, but it won’t end when COVID-19 does. These wearables can help workers avoid collisions with other employees or machinery. As forklifts and automated pallet jacks become quieter, these devices will be more crucial. Wearable proximity sensors keep employees alert, which is essential for preventing many accidents. AI Safety Data Analytics Many freight and shipping companies already use AI analytics to be more efficient. In 2021, more companies will start applying the same strategy to workplace safety. 2020 highlighted how much health and safety oversight there was in the industry, emphasizing the need for better insights. Data analytics can reveal safety weaknesses that companies may not have realized before. With more advanced AI, these programs could even suggest novel ways to improve. Now that employee health and safety issues are more prominent, it’s hard for companies to ignore the AI advantage. Increased Automation One of the most significant challenges facing the sector in 2021 is balancing efficiency with safety. In many areas, demand has outpaced capacity as companies adapt to new safety measures. Automation could provide an answer to both problems. Let's block ads! (Why?)
In this interview, Dimitrios Karnavos (EL/EPP) answers five questions on the 8th Environment Action Programme (EAP). The Mayor of Kallithea is the rapporteur for a draft opinion that requests adequate resources for local and regional authorities to implement environment policies on the ground. The draft opinion will be put to the vote at the next plenary session on 3-5 February after a general exploratory debate at the ENVE commission meeting on 1 February. While EU environment policies have delivered substantial benefits in the past decades, Europe still faces unprecedented environmental, climate and sustainability challenges. These include biodiversity loss, climate change, resource use and pollution. The 8th EAP is pivotal for tackling these challenges in a post COVID-19 era. From a local and regional perspective, what priorities should the 8th Environment Action Programme focus on? The 8th Environment Action Programme provides a long-term strategic vision and guidance for achieving a climate-neutral, resource-efficient and sustainable economy by 2050, in line with the European Green Deal, the new EU strategy for achieving climate neutrality by mid-century. The 8th Environment Action Programme, alongside the six priority objectives described in the proposal, reflect the objectives and expectations of local and regional leaders. The COVID-19 pandemic has taught us that a healthy living approach needs to be at the basis of all EU policies promoting human health, a healthy planet, a healthy economy and a healthy society with opportunities for everyone. In this context, a better link between health and environment is both fundamental and necessary. We need to ensure that the 8th EAP contributes to a toxic-free environment, provides better living standards for people and creates communities that are more resilient. We must also ensure that the 8th EAP promotes a sustainable business environment and fosters green investments at all levels (EU, national, regional and local). All this is needed if we want to have a stronger and sustainable EU in the post-COVID era.How can the new EAP ensure better integration of environment and climate prerogatives with other EU sectoral policies? How is the 8th EAP connected to the European Green Deal?Integrating environment and climate with other EU sectoral policies more effectively is not always easy, as different sectors have different priorities. Sometimes, even environment and climate policies themselves seem to work as opposing forces. For example, climate protection and carbon emission reduction policies promote the installation and operation of renewable energy projects. On the other hand, the particularly important policy of halting biodiversity loss and maintaining the cohesion of the Natura 2000 Network seems to clash, partly, with climate protection policy, for instance, when renewable energy projects are deployed and operated in protected areas. We must therefore be consistent and move in the same direction as we all face the same challenges. It is important to make the maximum use of available tools and methods so as to put in place a framework for ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement of environmental performance, including investments in environment and climate protection. We should also agree on a clear roadmap that will lead our journey to climate neutrality by 2050. As far as cities and regions are concerned, we must not forget that local and regional authorities have a special role to play in bringing together businesses, research institutes and academia as well as in engaging individuals and local stakeholders in designing and implementing environment policies.How can we ensure that environment policies are fully implemented in all EU communities?I certainly welcome the fact that the 8th EAP identifies more effective and efficient implementation as a key priority. In order to improve the implementation score, local and regional authorities should be equipped with the right instruments and adequate resources. We are responsible for implementing 70% of EU legislation, 90% of climate adaptation measures and 70% of climate mitigation actions. We need to have innovative approaches that empower local and regional authorities to provide tailor-made solutions to improve the implementation of environment policies on the ground, be it in urban, rural or mountain areas, islands or coastal zones. More research, data and knowledge are needed to address the specific environmental challenges we face and seize opportunities in different types of local and regional communities as each geographical area has its own challenges, weaknesses and strengths. Therefore, in my opinion on the 8th EAP, I call for a holistic, place-based or area-oriented approach as the best way to reach healthy living standards. We will not be successful if we do not put in place a functioning multilevel governance framework and encourage all levels of governance to promote cross-administrative, interregional, inter-municipal and cross-border cooperation on environment policies. We also need to strengthen the environmental knowledge base, harnessing the potential of digital and data technologies and increasing the use of nature-based solutions and social innovation to improve the implementation of environment objectives. For example, in Kallithea, the eighth largest municipality in Greece and the fourth biggest in the Athens urban area, we have implemented a project based on the use of digital technologies (iBeacons technology and Augmented Reality) to motivate residents and visitors to use sustainable forms of transport, such as walking and cycling, in order to reduce carbon emissions, improve air quality and highlight the need to preserve the city's historical and cultural heritage.How can the 8th EAP help to ensure that local and regional communities in the EU have adequate resources to implement EU environment and climate policies in the framework of a COVID-19 green recovery?As I mentioned, adequate resources are key if we are to implement environment and climate policies on the ground successfully. Resources include targeted financing and a clear legal framework but also administrative resources such as human expertise, capacity building, knowledge and sharing of best practices. The 8th EAP must develop an integrated framework to equip local and regional authorities with the right tools in line with the COVID-19 green recovery strategy. It must include incentives to move towards more ambitious environment policies, in particular for those that are lagging behind but also for those that are performing well so as to motivate them even further. I must admit that I regret the mismatch between the agreement on the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021-2027 and the 8th EAP. They should definitely be better coordinated. On the positive side, I am glad to see that the next EU budget places the climate and digital transitions at its core and that it has allocated 30% of both the EU's long-term budget and the NextGenerationEU package to fight climate change and that it also pays special attention to the environment and biodiversity. I hope that the 8th EAP will create the right framework for green and blue investments and innovation at all levels of governance. These are vital if we are to build resilient communities while creating growth and jobs in a fair and inclusive society based on solidarity. I also expect the 8th EAP to provide capacity-building instruments, a database of knowledge and best practices and incentives for city-to-city cooperation such as peer reviews and mutual learning activities, site visits and green twinning, to move the green recovery forward.Concerning the impact of COVID-19 on the environment agenda, is it a barrier or an opportunity to speed up action?It goes without saying that COVID-19 should be treated as an opportunity to accelerate the environment agenda. We have seen improved air quality, restoration of biodiversity and a general improvement in ecosystems during the last months. We should build on this. I welcome the fact that the EU plans a COVID-19 recovery that goes hand in hand with the green and digital transitions. Our local communities need to recover economically but in a sustainable and resilient way. What I think is important here is the need to improve our communication with individuals in order to have them on board as implementation can only be achieved with the full and daily engagement of everyone. We need to raise awareness of the benefits of climate, environment and biodiversity policies and demonstrate how these improve our health and wellbeing while making our local economies more sustainable and competitive.Background Information:Since the mid-1970s, EU environment policy has been guided by consecutive Environment Action Programmes (EAP), which define priority objectives to be achieved over a specific period of time. As the 7th EAP ended in 2020, the European Commission approved a proposal for the 8th EAP for the period up to 2030, aimed at complementing the European Green Deal.The CoR has adopted legislative opinions on past EAPs. In 2019, the CoR adopted an own-initiative opinion entitled Towards an 8th Environment Action Programme led by rapporteur Cor Lamers (NL/EPP), Mayor of Schiedam. The opinion was supported by a dedicated study. Building on the European Green Deal, the 8th EAP has six priority objectives. In order to measure and communicate whether the EU is on track to meet these objectives, the 8th EAP proposal suggests setting up a new monitoring framework.The European Committee of the Regions and the European Commission cooperate closely to ensure the effective implementation and development of environment policies through the Technical Platform for Cooperation on the Environment.Press contact: [email protected] Let's block ads! (Why?)
The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has required a large-scale and comprehensive response in various areas in our society. As the levels of governance closest to the citizens, local and regional authorities across Europe have been in the front line in the response to the crisis.The European Committee of the Regions (CoR) and the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) are conducting a targeted consultation of key organisations representing local and regional authorities in all EU Member States to take stock of their experiences in implementing COVID-related measures. The results of the questionnaire are expected to provide valuable information and will feed into the Committee of the Regions' opinion on "Experiences and Lessons learned by regions and cities during the COVID-19 crisis", as well as into the CEMR's work on this thematic. The aim is to bring forward practical suggestions and recommendations to the EU level and highlight the crucial role of local and regional authorities and their National Associations, in the response to the crisis and in the recovery, with a view to achieving a more efficient common response based on better regulation at national and EU level.The questionnaire can be accessed through this link and will run until 29 January 2021.Let's block ads! (Why?)
[unable to retrieve full-text content]European Commission Press release Brussels, 19 Jan 2021 Two days ahead of the meeting of European leaders on a coordinated response to the COVID-19 crisis, the Commission set out a number of actions needed to step up the fight against the pandemic.